Nigeria’s security and law enforcement system operates in a complex and often under-resourced environment, grappling with multifaceted crime, systemic issues, and external pressures. At its core, the system comprises several layers, including the Nigerian Army, Nigerian Police Force (NPF), Department of State Services (DSS), and specialized agencies like the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). However, these structures face significant challenges in addressing Nigeria’s security concerns.
Crime in Nigeria is multifaceted, ranging from terrorism and kidnapping to cybercrime and banditry. A single terrorist or criminal often engages in multiple illegal activities, such as money laundering, human trafficking, illegal arms possession, and bribery. This interconnectedness complicates law enforcement efforts and demands an equally multifaceted response.
Recruitment practices within the security sector suffer from patronage systems, where godfatherism can fast-track unfit candidates into positions of authority. Conversely, the best recruits may leave due to poor promotion practices or unpaid wages, leading to desertion or vulnerability to bribery. Pay disparities further exacerbate this. For instance at one point in the past, Boko Haram reportedly paid its members significantly more than the daily wages of Nigerian soldiers, creating an incentive for replacement hires.
Training is another critical gap. Security personnel often lack access to realistic operational simulations, and feedback loops are insufficient to refine skills. Limited budgets mean soldiers and police may enter live operations with minimal preparation, leaving them ill-equipped to respond effectively to threats. Additionally, a lack of comprehensive understanding of codes of conduct among many officers leads to human rights violations, further eroding public trust.
Nigeria’s military and police face severe equipment shortages. Only a fraction of tanks, assault weapons, and ammunition are operational, and forward planning for acquisitions is inadequate, with long delays between procurement and delivery. These issues limit the effectiveness of operations, particularly in combating well-armed insurgents.
The workforce itself is strained. With a population of over 203 million, Nigeria’s army comprises 120,000 active personnel, with only 25% considered combat-ready. The police-to-civilian ratio is approximately 1:662, far below the UN-recommended 1:400, and significantly lower than countries like Singapore (1:137). This understaffing, combined with a lack of advanced technologies like reliable criminal databases, fingerprint systems, and CCTV, hampers the ability to prevent and solve crimes effectively.
Technology gaps are glaring. Security agencies lack the tools to intercept kidnappers’ calls or track terrorist movements, leaving them unable to prevent or resolve certain crimes. Despite attempts to establish forensic laboratories, such as one commissioned in 2016, progress has been slow due to limited funding and training. Institutions like the Defence Industry Corporation of Nigeria (DICON), established to address these needs, remain underfunded and underutilized.
Strategic communication is another weak point. Poor media management has fueled misinformation and speculation about security personnel’s complicity in crimes. The lack of a coordinated approach between the Defence Headquarters (DHQ) and the National Orientation Agency (NOA) has allowed insurgent groups like Boko Haram to dominate the narrative through effective propaganda, undermining public confidence in the government.
Professionalism in the security sector is often compromised by extortion at roadblocks, a blurred line between police and military roles, and political interference. Senior officers sometimes focus more on defending failures than addressing systemic lapses, further eroding trust.
Nigeria faces threats from numerous groups, including Boko Haram, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), cultists, kidnappers, bandits, and regional militias. These threats are compounded by issues like land and farmer-herder disputes and illegal activities such as contraband smuggling and fish theft by foreign actors.
Funding remains a fundamental problem. Nigeria spends below the recommended 1.5–3.3% of GDP on defense, and the allocated funds are often misappropriated. Investigations have uncovered widespread corruption, including inflated contracts and the diversion of security votes, further weakening the system. For example, while the police requested significant budget allocations, only a fraction of these funds have been disbursed.
Structural inefficiencies also plague the system. Agencies like the DSS, NSCDC, and EFCC operate independently of the police, despite overlapping functions. Calls for integrating these bodies under a unified structure have been resisted, while the federal government continues to reject state police proposals.
In summary, Nigeria’s security apparatus struggles with a combination of resource constraints, corruption, technological gaps, and systemic inefficiencies. Addressing these challenges requires comprehensive reforms, increased funding, and a focus on professionalism to build a more effective and trustworthy security system.