Thursday, 8 January 2026

IHEREN - TASSILI-N-AGGER

Pictographs in the late Bovidian style: 2000 - 750 B.C.

In the central Sahara, the landscape of Iheren, located in the northern Tassili, provided a "refugium"—a stable environment during periods of increasing Saharan aridity for transhumant pastoralist communities towards the end of the Halocene Wet Phase.

​On the sandstone panels at the site are displayed a great diversity of Scenes: The sheer density of human figures, varied dress, and complex activities (hair-braiding, tent-pitching, socializing) suggests a gathering of multiple kinship groups.

​The "Social Landscape": Unlike the isolated figures of earlier styles, Iheren art depicts crowds. This is a hallmark of an aggregation site where nomadic groups converged seasonally to trade, arrange marriages, and resolve disputes.

​Sustainable Semi-Sedentary Life

​Holl argues that the society depicted at Iheren was not strictly nomadic, but semi-sedentary.

​Ecological Anchors: The presence of gueltas (natural water tanks) in the deep canyons allowed communities to stay in one place for several months.

​Architectural Evidence in Art: The paintings provide a "blueprint" of their camps, showing sophisticated mat-covered tents and specialized storage areas. This level of domestic infrastructure suggests a community that stays put long enough to invest in heavy, non-portable shelter.

​Social Stratification: The intricate detail in clothing and ornamentation (the "fine line" style) indicates a society with enough surplus time and resources to develop distinct social roles and hierarchies

​On a Trade and Cattle Route

​The Iheren sites are strategically positioned on the northern fringe of the Tassili plateau.

​The "Gateway" Position: Iheren sits at a natural transition point between the high plateau and the lowland plains (wadis). This made it a vital node on cattle-driving routes.

​Resource Exchange: Its location allowed for the exchange of highland resources (stone, specific plants) with lowland goods. The art depicts "traveling scenes" with pack oxen, further substantiating the site's role as a waypoint for long-distance movement.

​Subsequent Archaeological Evidence

​Since Holl’s initial claims, several archaeological findings have bolstered the theory that the Iheren style reflects a highly organized pastoral society:

​Zooarchaeology: Excavations in the Tadrart Acacus and Tassili have found cattle bones dated to this period, confirming that the "Bovidian" focus of the art was matched by a cattle-centric economy.

​Ceramic Analysis: Discovery of "Pastoral Neolithic" pottery with sophisticated decorative motifs mirrors the intricate patterns found in Iheren dress and body art.

​Site Surveys: Mapping of stone "tumuli" (burial mounds) near these art sites suggests a territorial claim to the land, which is a key trait of semi-sedentary pastoralists.

In Chapter 2, "The Archaeological Context," Holl sets the stage for his "archaeology of symbols."

​The Critique: He critiques previous "art-historical" approaches that focused only on the beauty of the paintings.

​The Methodology: He introduces his spatial analysis method. Instead of looking at one painting, he looks at the entire site as a mapped living space.

​Bridging the Gap: He argues that rock art should be treated like any other archaeological artifact (like a shard of pottery). He establishes the timeline of the "Pastoral" period, asserting that the transition from the Round Head style to the Iheren style represents a massive shift from hunter-gatherer mythologies to pastoralist social realities.

​Would you like me to dive deeper into the specific social hierarchies Holl identifies within the "tents" depicted in the Iheren paintings?

In the context of the Iheren style and Augustin Holl’s analysis, the gueltas of the Tassili n’Ajjer are not just "watering holes"—they are the primary environmental engine that allowed a complex, semi-sedentary society to exist in a desert.

(​1). What are Gueltas?

​A guelta is a natural water pocket formed within rocky basins or deep depressions. In the Tassili n’Ajjer, these are typically found at the base of narrow, towering sandstone canyons.

​The Trap Mechanism: During the African Humid Period (roughly 10,000–5,000 years ago), the plateau received significant rainfall. The narrow canyons (wadis) act as funnels, and the deep rock basins at their ends capture and protect water from the Saharan sun.

​Thermal Protection: Because the canyon walls are so high and narrow, the sun rarely hits the water directly. This drastically reduces evaporation, allowing a single pool to persist for years, even during prolonged droughts.

(​2). The Role of "Fossil Water"

​The term fossil water (or paleowater) refers to ancient groundwater trapped in aquifers for millennia, disconnected from the modern hydrological cycle.

​The Sandstone Sponge: The Tassili is a vast Sandstone Aquifer System. Sandstone is highly porous; it acts like a giant geological sponge.

​The "Seep" Effect: The water in these gueltas is often not just leftover rainwater. It is "fossil" water that has been stored inside the porous sandstone for thousands of years, slowly seeping out of the canyon walls as springs.

​Sustainability: This meant that even when the rains failed, the Iheren people had access to a "geological inheritance"—a reliable, non-renewable but long-lasting water supply that could support large herds of cattle.

(​3). Deep Canyons as Social Refugia

​Holl argues that these canyons created a specific settlement pattern seen in the Iheren style:

​Semi-Sedentism: Because the gueltas provided a permanent water source, communities didn't need to be purely nomadic. They could "anchor" themselves to a canyon for most of the year, only moving when local grazing was exhausted.

​Aggregation Points: The gueltas became natural meeting grounds. If you look at Iheren-style paintings, you see clusters of tents and people; these represent the "urbanization" of the canyon floors.

​Defense and Shelter: The canyons provided a micro-climate (cooler than the plateau) and physical protection, which Holl links to the "Bovidian" shift toward more domestic, family-oriented life.

(​4). Archaeological Substantiation

​Modern hydrology and archaeology have confirmed this "Refugium" theory:

​Iherir Oasis: This is a modern-day example of what Holl describes. It contains a series of permanent gueltas and travertine dams that have supported human life and agriculture (including wheat and fruit) for thousands of years.

​Stable Isotope Analysis: Tests on water from Saharan gueltas often confirm it is indeed "fossil" water from the early Holocene, proving that the water source was stable enough to support the "sustainable large communities.

#Africa  #BlackHistory #World

THE US ATTACK IN VENEZUELA

I'm going to enlighten some people who are ignorant about geopolitics.

First, it's important to understand the difference between strategic agreements and mutual defense agreements between two countries.

Strategic agreements allow two countries to supply each other with weapons as much as they wish, depending on their needs, but without direct military intervention.
Mutual defense agreements, on the other hand, obligate signatory countries to help each other in the event of a conflict, with weapons and troops, without restriction, like NATO or the ESA.

You should know that Russia has only signed mutual defense agreements with two countries: North Korea and Belarus.
For a long time, Russia has tried to create a NATO-type alliance to counter the West, but all the countries approached refused, for fear of Western sanctions. Iran, in fact, paid part of the price. Without the strategic agreements that allowed Russia to quickly supply weapons to iran, Israel would probably have gained the upper hand.  Thanks to these rapid deliveries, the use of Russian satellites for improved targeting, and the accelerated redeployment of missile defense batteries, Iran was able to withstand the Twelve Day War.

I see some ignorant people talking about Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, and Bashar al-Assad.

Gaddafi had no agreement with either Russia or China. He had instead aligned himself with Sarkozy, who ultimately betrayed him. I even heard a Chinese chief of staff explain that Russia had done everything it could to get closer to Gaddafi, but that he had declined the offer.

Saddam Hussein was one of the United States' biggest partners. He was even used to wage war against Iran, despite warnings from Iranians that he was making a grave mistake. He chose to listen to those who later became his executioners, isolated him, and left him to face his fate alone. Bashar al-Assad was betrayed by his own high-ranking military officers, who ordered the soldiers not to fight. They were allegedly bribed by American intelligence services. Russia had warned Assad a month earlier that his soldiers were betraying him, but he ignored them. Russia had also advised him to arm and reform his army to confront the advancing enemy, as it was already preoccupied in Ukraine with NATO. Again, he ignored these warnings, and that is how he was driven out by the terrorists.

It should also be noted that Russia conducted several airstrikes against these terrorists, pushing them back several kilometers. However, after negotiations with Trump and the terrorist leader, Russia halted its strikes. The terrorist leader himself acknowledged that Russia had killed many of his soldiers, but maintained that agreements existed between them and that Russia was obligated to respect them. To this day, Russia still maintains bases in Syria. Tell the United States to attack North Korea or Belarus, and we'll see what happens.

Friday, 2 January 2026

THE HISTORY OF PALESTINE IN 1948

As the British prepared to terminate their mandate over Palestine in 1948, their biggest headache was how to get rid of 254 Jewish nationalists detained at the Jewish detention Camp at Gilgil Kenya.

Previously these Jews had been detained in a camp near Asmara Eritrea after being shipped in from Palestine where it was feared that they would be rescued by fellow Jews.

But owing to political and security considerations in Eritrea, especially after many escaped in August 1946, it was found necessary to move them to the interior part of Africa. For this reason Kenya, Gilgil to be specific was chosen as the ideal place for detention.

They were not convicted by the courts but selected for detention by the British who labelled them as "Terrorists", for fighting for what they believed was their land. They arrived at Gilgil in March 1947, where a makeshift detention camp was erected. 

They numbered 291, when they arrived but by June 1948, the number had reduced to 254 after many escaped by digging tunnels under the camp.

At first the detainess were promised that they woud be returned to the Mandatory Palestine in June 1947 and arrangements made to send them by air, starting on 10th June. 

However, this was suspended as His Majesty's Government was careful not to do anything that could compromise the success of the negotiations for a cease fire during the 1947-1948 Civil War in Mandatory Palestine and also for fear of putting the lives of British troops at risk.

Tired of these promises, the detainees began to dig an 80m escape  tunnel underneath the Gilgil Camp.

On March 29,1948, seven detainees led by Yaakov Meridor who later served as Israel Member of Parliament and also as Minister for Economic Planning in 1981, made a daring escape from Gilgil Camp. Many more followed.

They were met outside the camp by two Jews from South Africa who had brought them  South African passports.

They crossed over to Uganda using the passports before proceeding to see the Belgian Ambassador who facilitated their journey to Israel via Belgium and Congo.

In mid 1948, the British government started considering seriously how to get rid of the detainees, after pressure from the Colonial Governor of Kenya. 

First the British mandate over Palestine was coming to an end, and as the officials  wrote,” ..If as a result of political objection we delay the return of the detainees to Palestine until the moment we lose our mandate over it,we risk being left with these thugs in our hands, The Arabs will not admit them and the Jews may quite possibly have their own Political reasons for refusing to accept some or all of them, and if as we hope the moderate elements of the Yeshur are in control of the new Jewish state, they might well refuse to have them. And we can't keep them in Kenya, they are a little more than thugs.”

Secondly the Medical Officer who visited the Gilgil camp to perform health checks on the Jewish detainees, had warned the Government that the detainees were moody and were likely to riot if they were not repatriated to Palestine. They had told the Medical Officer that they didn't care to live or die and would not attempt to make an escape but to create a situation for the guards to slaughter them.

Since the guards at the camp were black  the British feared the repercussions, especially from the Americans and the Jews in diaspora, of a black Kenyan  butchering a Jew. 

Plans were therefore made to transport them back to Palestine. The initial proposal was that they be shipped to Palestine via the Suez Canal  but there was a huddle ahead.

According to International Sanitary convention of 1936 any ship passing through the Suez Canal had to declare its presence and the  people on board. So there were fears that declaring the presence of the Jewish detainees on board to the Egyptian authorities could leak information to the Arabs who would try to forcefully eject the detainees or shoot at the ship. So a different route had to be selected which involved airlifts.

#History #World

THE WORST PASTORS IN THE WORLD

The title of "the worst pastor in the world" is subjective and often applied in public discourse to individuals accused of significant misconduct, abuse of power, or financial fraud.

Commonly cited examples in media and online discussions of pastors considered "worst" by critics often include:

TB Joshua: A BBC investigation uncovered over a decade of allegations of rape, torture, and forced abortions by the influential Nigerian televangelist within his compound. He was known for claiming to perform miracles and amassed significant wealth before his death in 2021.

John MacArthur: Described in one opinion piece as the "worst pastor in the world," critics accuse him of promoting racist ideologies, extreme anti-feminism, and enabling a culture of abuse and the shunning of abuse victims within his church. His church faced lawsuits after a young man committed suicide following counseling that allegedly suggested suicide for those who could not be "good Christians".

Televangelists known for the Prosperity Gospel: Figures like

Kenneth Copeland, Benny Hinn, and Jim Bakker are frequently criticized for using their platforms to solicit donations from financially vulnerable people to fund lavish lifestyles, such as private jets and mansions, while promising "blessings" in return. Jim Bakker was eventually convicted of fraud for a semi-Ponzi scheme related to lifetime memberships for a resort.

Pastors involved in sexual abuse scandals: High-profile cases have emerged from various large organizations, including the Hillsong Church network and the Institute in Basic Life Principles (IBLP), where founders like Bill Gothard stepped down after multiple allegations of sexual harassment and molestation.

Ultimately, the "worst" pastor often depends on the specific type of harm or misconduct an individual prioritizes, whether it be financial exploitation, physical or sexual abuse, or the promotion of harmful social ideologies.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...