What the Media Said, What Author Highlighted, What their Data & Disclaimers Said: A Critical Analysis of the 2025 Max Planck Study

The 2025 Max Planck study analyzing 210 ancient genomes from Mediterranean sites has reshaped how we view Phoenician–Punic history. It finds that after 600 BCE, Punic populations were highly diverse, showing little direct Levantine ancestry. Instead, the dominant lineages trace to Aegean and Sicilian groups, with important—but secondary—North African input. Phoenician culture, it turns out, spread more through influence than through mass migration. Yet, the earliest founders, who cremated their dead, remain unsampled, leaving the first chapters of Punic history still unwritten.

Key Strengths of the Study

The study stands out for its careful methodology. It draws on 14 different sites across Iberia, Sardinia, Sicily, North Africa, and the Levant, dramatically improving on earlier, narrowly focused efforts. Nuclear DNA—not just mitochondrial DNA—forms the core of its conclusions, avoiding one of the main pitfalls of ancient DNA studies. The researchers also apply strong contamination controls and focus on well-dated graves, mostly securely placed between the sixth and second centuries BCE.

Importantly, the authors avoid simplistic conclusions. They recognize that culture does not equal ancestry: Punic material culture spread across the Mediterranean, but the people carrying that culture were a genetically mixed mosaic.

Sampling Limits: 300 Cities, 14 Sites

However, a major constraint of the study is often overlooked: although ancient sources and archaeology document over 300 Phoenician and Punic cities stretching from Lebanon to Morocco and Iberia, only 14 archaeological sites were sampled for DNA.

This is no technical footnote. It means that over 95% of known Phoenician-Punic urban centers remain genetically invisible. Critically important founding cities like Tyre, Sidon, Utica, Hadrumetum, Lepcis Magna, and even large sectors of Carthage itself—cities that defined Phoenician expansion—were not sampled.

Moreover, the current sample disproportionately favors Sicilian and Aegean sites, which had intense cultural and genetic intermixing with nearby Mediterranean populations. North African heartlands and eastern Mediterranean hubs—where Phoenician culture first arose and consolidated—are significantly underrepresented.

As a result, the heavy Aegean-Sicilian ancestry signature visible in the dataset may partly reflect where the DNA was collected, not necessarily the broader genetic reality of all Punic populations. Without founder-period genomes and more balanced geographic coverage, generalizations about “Phoenician” or “Punic” identity remain provisional hypotheses, not settled facts.

The Missing Story: E1b, J1, and Media Silence

What the headlines missed—or deliberately ignored—is this:

Sub-Saharan African-linked Y-DNA haplogroups dominated the Punic samples.

 • E1b lineages were the most common, found in 14 out of 58 males.

 • J1a lineages, often linked to Afroasiatic speakers, accounted for 5 out of 58 individuals when corrected across samples.

 • G2a lineages, linked to linguistically isolated Anatolian farmers, accounted for 7 out of 58 sequences men. 

Both E1b and J1a in the Punic samples point directly to Afroasiatic-speaking African and Semitic ancestral roots — not European ones.

Meanwhile, R1b—the haplogroup loudly advertised in media releases—appeared only 10 times and is easily explained by local Mediterranean admixture from European neighbors. Indo-Europeans arrived in 2nd and 1st millenium BCE according to previous studies, after Phoenician cultures had their language, cities, settlements and already secured sea routes.

Instead of highlighting the high African-origin E1b presence and the significant Afroasiatic J1 component, both the study and the headlines turned up the volume only for R1b mentions, misleading the public into associating Punic ancestry with European inputs.

If the Y-DNA results were honestly reported, the public would realize that the core biological signals in Punic males reflected deep African and Afroasiatic lineages, not merely Greek, Roman, or European ones.

Critical Caveats and Missing Layers

Applying the SCHUENEMANN MISTAKES framework reveals further limitations:

🔹 Unrepresentative Samples: Early Phoenician settlers practiced cremation, meaning the founding generation’s DNA is mostly lost.

🔹 Temporal Gaps: No samples exist from the crucial 900–600 BCE period—the time when Punic cities like Carthage, Cádiz, and Motya were founded.

🔹 Oversimplified African Signals: Although North African ancestry is acknowledged, it is modeled broadly without deeper distinctions between Saharan, trans-Saharan, or coastal African gene flows.

🔹 Historical Context Thinness: Trade, slavery, and colonization, vital to Punic societal development, receive limited treatment alongside genetic analysis.

🔹 Survivorship Bias: The genetic record favors later groups who practiced inhumation, naturally amplifying signals of later regional mixture.

Common Media Misinterpretations

Popular media coverage has further blurred the study’s careful boundaries:

🔹 Equating Punic descendants with original Phoenician settlers.

🔹 Treating “Levantine DNA” as a timeless, homogeneous entity, ignoring major admixture waves shown in studies like Haber et al. (2017).

🔹 Confusing cultural affiliation with biological descent. Burial styles, artifacts, and language adoption do not automatically reveal ancestry without corroborating inscriptions, civic identities, or naming patterns.

An apt analogy: Sampling 14 sites in that 19th-century India and Pakistan, and concluding more subjects of the British empire had Indian DNA than previously thought. A similar care is needed here.

What the Study Proves—and What It Doesn’t

The study definitively proves that by the Carthaginian imperial period, Punic populations were already genetically diverse, dominated by Aegean-Sicilian and North African ancestry. It also proves that Phoenician culture spread mainly through influence, trade, and adaptation, not mass transplantation of populations.

However, it does not prove that the earliest Phoenician settlers lacked Levantine roots. Their genetic legacy remains untested due to cremation practices and critical sampling gaps.

Nor does it prove that the Sicilian-Aegean ancestry observed reflects all Punic populations. The dataset is heavily weighted toward Sicily and the Aegean, while North Africa and the Phoenician homeland remain substantially under-sampled. Thus, conclusions about Mediterranean-wide Punic genetic patterns must remain cautious and qualified.

And critically—it does not justify downplaying the strong African genetic signatures visible in Punic Y-DNA data.

Paths Forward

Future research should:

■ Recover founder-period DNA wherever feasible, even from cremated remains.

■ Expand sampling across neglected territories such as Malta, Libya, and western Algeria.

■ Integrate genetic data with inscriptions, naming practices, and civic records to distinguish settlers from assimilated locals.

🌍 Model African ancestry with greater nuance, distinguishing North African coastal, Saharan, and sub-Saharan components.

Conclusion: Humility Over Haste

The 2025 Max Planck study is a methodological milestone in ancient Mediterranean genetics. It shines a light on the multicultural, adaptive nature of Punic societies after 600 BCE and corrects outdated assumptions of simple Levantine dominance.

Yet, it also leaves major gaps unfilled. Without founder DNA and with only a thin slice of 300 cities sampled, our understanding of Phoenician and Punic genetic origins remains incomplete.

And until the public confronts the full Y-DNA evidence—where African-rooted lineages like E1b and Afroasiatic-linked lineages like J1 dominate—no conversation about Punic heritage will be complete.

In short: cultural transmission outpaced genetic migration, and Punic civilization was not a simple export of bloodlines, but a dynamic, evolving Mediterranean phenomenon. Humility—not haste—must guide all reconstructions of Phoenician and Punic identity.

⸻

Sampling 14 sites out of 300 cities is like describing Rome from its frontier towns—a reality that popular media coverage consistently failed to grasp.

#Africa #World

The African Popes Who Shaped Christianity – and Gave You Valentine’s Day

Before North Africa 🌍 became predominantly Muslim, it was one of Christianity’s beating hearts — a powerhouse that produced popes who changed global faith forever. Three African-descended popes — Victor I, Miltiades, and Gelasius I — shaped Easter, reshaped Church authority, and even birthed Valentine’s Day. Each left fingerprints on Christian civilization still visible today.

Let’s break it down.

Victor I (189–199 CE): The Easter Warrior and Latin Reformer

Thought to be of Berber ancestry, Victor I ruled the Church during a time when Christianity was illegal, and persecution was just one accusation away. At the center of his legacy? Easter. Victor I battled factions across the Roman Empire who celebrated Easter on Passover dates — not Sundays. Seeing a splintered faith as a ticking time bomb, he convened the very first Roman Synod, ordering that Easter be permanently celebrated on a Sunday, in line with Jesus’ resurrection.

Victor wasn’t playing pattycake. He threatened excommunication for any bishops who defied the decision — rare, ruthless, and remarkable in a pre-legal Church. But he wasn’t finished. Victor I also introduced Latin as the language of Catholic liturgy, replacing Ancient Greek. Latin was the mother tongue of his African world, from Carthage to Leptis Magna, and would define Catholic ritual for the next 1,500 years. As Prof Christopher Bellitto reminds us, Victor’s success was extraordinary given that “he was the Bishop of Rome when Christianity was illegal”.

Miltiades (311–314 CE): The First Papal Landlord

Miltiades was also born in Africa 🌍 — rising to power just as Rome’s icy grip on Christians thawed. During his reign, Emperor Constantine legalized Christianity, showering it with imperial favor. While Miltiades himself didn’t negotiate this — he was, in Prof Bellitto’s words, “the recipient of Roman benevolence” — he was still the first pope to be given a palace: the Lateran Palace.

Constantine also granted Miltiades permission to build the Lateran Basilica, the first major public Christian church in Rome — still called “the mother of all churches” today. Miltiades quietly presided over Christianity’s entrance into official Roman life — a tectonic shift whose aftershocks continue across the world 🌎.

Gelasius I (492–496 CE): The Architect of Church Supremacy and Valentine’s Day

Gelasius I wasn’t born in Africa 🇪🇬 but was of North African descent — a Roman by citizenship but African by heritage. Of the three, Gelasius was the heavyweight champion. He formally introduced the term “Vicar of Christ”, cementing the Pope’s theological authority as Christ’s representative on Earth.

He also developed the Doctrine of the Two Swords — affirming that the Church and State had separate powers, but that the Church’s spiritual authority was ultimate. This doctrine would fuel medieval popes who vetoed kings and crowned emperors, claiming a power pipeline straight from God. When the East-West schism trembled during the Acacian Controversy, Gelasius pushed harder than any pope before to establish Rome’s supremacy over global Christianity 🌍.

And yes — Gelasius I gave you Valentine’s Day. In 496 CE, he officially Christianized the Roman fertility festival Lupercalia, dedicating 14 February to honor Saint Valentine — a quiet act of cultural genius that still echoes in today’s chocolates, roses, and handwritten notes.

What Did Africa’s Popes Look Like?

Here’s where modern minds must be careful. The Roman Empire didn’t think in terms of “race” as we do today — they thought in ethnicity, language, and place. Prof Bellitto makes it clear: “They didn’t deal with race, they dealt with ethnicity.” Prof Philomena Mwaura 🇰🇪 from Kenyatta University adds that Roman North Africa was a multicultural crossroads — Berbers, Punic peoples, Roman settlers, and freed Africans intertwined.

In Roman eyes, to be “African” often simply meant Roman from Africa — not a skin-color category. Thus, whether deep brown, medium brown, or otherwise, the African popes would have been seen as children of Africa 🌍 — and proud of it.

Why No African Popes After Gelasius?

After Gelasius I, North Africa fell into violent upheaval. The collapse of the Western Roman Empire, followed by the Islamic expansion into North Africa in the 7th century, shattered the African Christian infrastructure. But there’s another darker reason, as Prof Bellitto highlights: Over time, the election of popes became an Italian monopoly 🇮🇹 — a closed circle where global diversity was frozen out.

Today, however, tides are shifting. Catholicism is growing fastest in Sub-Saharan Africa — already boasting 281 million faithful Catholics as of 2023 📈. Three African contenders — Fridolin Ambongo Besungu 🇨🇩, Peter Kodwo Appiah Turkson 🇬🇭, and Robert Sarah 🇬🇳 — are now on the radar to possibly succeed Pope Francis.

As Prof Mwaura notes, “Although Christianity is very strong in Africa, the power of the Church is still in the North… But as African churches continue growing stronger and supporting themselves, their day will come”. And when it does, history will not be shocked — only restored. 

Closing Thought

Africa 🌍 didn’t just embrace Christianity. It shaped it, preserved it, argued over it, codified it — and sent its brightest minds into the heart of the Church. If you celebrate Easter on a Sunday or exchange Valentine’s Day love notes, you are living the legacy of African brilliance — whether you know it or not.

⸻

Citation:

Catherine Heathwood, BBC World Service, “How African Popes Changed Christianity — and Gave Us Valentine’s Day,” 2024.

#World #History

HOW MARITIME LAW WAS TWISTED INTO THE LAW OF THE LAND

Most of us have been living under a legal system we were #never meant to be part of.

Maritime and admiralty laws — meant #only for ships and commerce on the sea — have been twisted into laws that wrongly govern men and women standing on the land.

It’s time to understand what really happened, and why reclaiming your true status matters now more than ever.

Originally, MaritimeLaw (also called Admiralty Law) was created only to govern activities on the sea:

➤ Shipping

➤ Trade between nations

➤ Navigation

➤ Disputes between merchants and sailors

It had #nothing to do with living people standing on dry land.

SO HOW DID IT GET TWISTED?

Over time, governments and banking powers blurred the lines between maritime law and civil law.

They reclassified people — not as living men and women — but as corporate entities (“persons”) involved in commerce.

This happened through:

➤ Birth certificates (registering you like a vessel)

➤ Driver’s licenses

➤ Social security numbers

➤ Court procedures

They pulled everyone into a commercial system, where maritime rules are wrongly applied on land.

This allows courts and governments to treat people as if they were ships in commerce, rather than sovereign beings under natural law.

EXAMPLES OF MAJOR MARITIME LAWS TWISTED ONTO LAND

1️⃣ Law of the Flag

➤ Ships are governed by the flag they sail under.

➤ Twist on land: Courtrooms #display flags (often gold-fringed) to show maritime jurisdiction, treating you like a vessel under their authority.

2️⃣ Presumed Contract

➤ Ships at sea presume contracts exist unless challenged.

➤ Twist on land: Governments #presume you agree to licenses, taxes, and regulations unless you formally object or correct your status.

3️⃣ Salvage Rights

➤ At sea, rescuers can claim a reward for saving a ship or cargo.

➤ Twist on land: Your car, home, or property can be “seized” and auctioned under commercial rules, treating it like salvaged goods.

4️⃣ General Average

➤ Losses at sea are shared among all cargo holders.

➤ Twist on land: Taxation and financial #bailouts often force individuals to “share” debts they never agreed to.

5️⃣ Law of Prize

➤ Ships captured during wartime are treated as prizes and claimed.

➤ Twist on land: Under emergency powers or martial law, personal rights and properties can be seized as if you were enemy property.

THE TRUT

Maritime laws were never meant to govern free people standing on land.

➤ You are not a ship.

➤ You are not cargo.

➤ You are not property.

You are a living man or living woman, born with natural rights that no contract, no government, and no court can take away without your knowing, willing consent.

Understanding this isn’t just about history — it’s about your future.

Knowing the difference between #maritime law and #natural law is the first step toward reclaiming your #sovereignty.

The moment you stand in the full truth of who you are — living, breathing, unregistered and free — the game begins to change.

Knowledge isn’t just power. It’s freedom.

WHY ARE BLACK PEOPLE CALLED "CHILDREN OF THE SUN"??

Many of the Eurocentric scholars have been intimidating Afrikans to stay away from the sun, citing that too much exposure to sunlight can blacken the skin and cause skin cancer and a lot of Africans have bought in the idea especially African girls termed the yellow bones who enlighten & bleach their skins. Others are African parents who teach their children to stay away from the sun.

What these people failed to understand is the fact that we are the original people of the universe, thus, making us biologically, chemically and genetically different from Europeans and Asians. For example, Europeans, Arabs and Asians all have Neanderthal DNA and Rhesus gene that are absent in Afrikans. Just like how plants have a pigment called CHLOROPHYLL which convert Sunlight to food via PHOTOSYNTHESIS, Afrikans also have a Carbon-based pigment called MELANIN all over our bodies which gave us the black or brown colour. Melanin works exactly like Chlorophyll in plants. Since Afrikans are the original human race, Afrikans have a lot of melanin under their skins, thus making Afrikans very dark, black or brown. On the other hand, Europeans/Arabs/Asians have little melanin under their skin, thus making them pink/red/pale. While Albinos have no melanin, thus making them the lightest people on the planet.

Melanin serves two major roles in the human body. Firstly, it prevents the entry of harmful Ultraviolet rays into the body, thus protecting senstive body cells from ionization by these rays. Secondly, melanin feeds the human body.

Abundant melanin in black people helps in the prevention of the penetration of the sun's Ultraviolet Rays  into the Afrikan body, thus preventing Afrikans from developing any form of skin cancer.

Europeans/Asians/Arabs on the other hand, have little melanin in them, thus making them very prone both to the sunburn, to the penetration of Ultraviolet Rays, and then to  skin cancer.

Afrikans are not called CHILDREN OF THE SUN for fun; we are called this because the SUN DOES NOT HARM US. In fact, our Afrikan bodies FEED and DEPEND ON THE SUN for survival. When an Afrikan body gets into contact with sunlight, the skin produces a hormone called CHOLECALCIFEROL  which goes to the LIVER to help with the production of another prohormone called  Calcidiol, which  is mistakenly called 'VITAMIN D'.

A research contacted in the United States few years ago indicated that, Afrikans (in America) have a high probability  of dying from Breast cancer, Prostate cancer and other  cancers than other races. Indeed, Afrikans are becoming victims of cancers because they are eating and drinking synthetic craps of Europeans that violate the natural nutrition law of an Afrikan body. While processed foods and drinks are the known  causes of cancer in Afrikans, Afrikans are primarily dying from cancers because they became sunlight deficient. The daily routine of the Afrikans in the West is: house -into the car-into the office-into the car-into club/casino/house. Lack of sunlight exposure leads to deprivation of the body from producing a prohormone called Calcidiol  (vitamin D), thus leading to the confusion, corruption and abnormal multiplication of body cells (which is called Cancer).

It is time to unlearn what you were taught by Eurocentric education systems. These systems were crafted on the basis of racism. Their studies and researches are always done on European bodies, but not on Afrikan bodies. It is thus stupid to believe in European studies and researches while you as an Afrikan are genetically, biologically, chemically and physically different from Europeans and Asians. Our bodies are different from theirs. When they are saying that too much sunlight exposure causes skin cancer, it causes skin cancer in Europeans/Asians/Arabs because they have little melanin, NOT IN AFRIKANS! And lastly, vitamin D is not needed for bones, vitamin D is entirely needed by every system in your body!

A Question of Color: The Curious Case of Being Black in Africa and Beyond

If there’s one thing that becomes immediately clear about the term "Black," it’s that it is as elastic as a well-worn pair of socks, stretching to fit a range of contexts and shrinking under scrutiny. In Africa, a continent of 54 countries, over a thousand languages, and a mosaic of cultures, the term "Black" doesn’t just come with one-size-fits-all packaging. No, no—within Africa, "Black" can mean so many different things that you might need a flowchart to keep up.

Let's start with the basics: skin color. In a continent where melanin is generally more generously bestowed by nature, you’d think the definition of "Black" would be straightforward. But this is Africa, after all, where straightforward is a word used sparingly. For example, in North Africa—think Morocco, Algeria, Egypt—you find people who are typically described as “Arab” or “Berber.” The Berber come in many different skin tones from white to black. In these parts, the label "Black" is often reserved for those who look like they might have roots further south, like from sub-Saharan Africa. Yet even here, the definition shifts like Saharan sands: a Tuareg or Nubian, dark-skinned but not quite "Black" in the traditional Western sense, may identify as African but be described in local terms that bear no relation to "Blackness."

Travel down to South Africa, and you hit another delightful conundrum. Here, "Black" doesn’t just mean skin color; it’s also about ethnicity, history, and, yes, politics. Under apartheid, South Africans were neatly divided into "Black," "White," "Coloured," and "Indian" categories. A "Black" person was someone of African descent, but what of those mixed with European or Asian heritage? The "Coloured" people—descendants of mixed race unions, including indigenous Khoisan, enslaved Africans, Europeans, and Asians—were often too Black to be White, but not quite Black enough to be Black. Yet, the Khoisan are the oldest continuous inhabitants of Africa, but due to ignorance and skin tones, some South Africans don’t call themselves “Black. Confused yet? I certainly am

Move into East Africa, and "Black" becomes even more interesting. In Kenya or Tanzania, a Kikuyu, Maasai, or Luo person would be considered "Black," but not all Black Africans are perceived the same way. The Somalis, with their distinct features, might be seen as somewhat apart from their neighbors either by foreigners or due to dynastic theory while incorrectly classified Ethiopians, Eritreans and Somalis as Caucasian, even though they are from the continent. Meanwhile, among the Somali themselves, clan distinctions might be more significant than any overarching label of "Black."

Now, let’s take the term "Black" on a field trip outside Africa and brace ourselves for a new set of complications. In America, "Black" is both a social and political identity, shaped by a specific history of slavery, segregation, and civil rights struggles. It generally refers to anyone with African ancestry, regardless of how distant or mixed. A South African Zulu, a Nigerian Yoruba, and an Ethiopian Amhara would all be "Black" in America—united by the broad brush of race. But a North African Moroccan or an Egyptian? That’s more ambiguous; sometimes they're Black, sometimes they're Middle Eastern, and sometimes they're just "other."

Cross over to Europe, and the word "Black" begins another round of identity gymnastics. In the UK, "Black" has evolved into a more inclusive political term that might encompass all people of color. So, while someone from Jamaica and someone from Ghana might both be “Black,” in practice, they might experience a different sort of "Blackness." A Ghanaian may fill out either Black British or African British on a form, a Jamaican may fill out Black British, while the child of a Jamaican mother and Ghanian father gets to pick Black or African. Add to the mix people of Asian descent from the Caribbean or Africa, and you begin to see how wonderfully perplexing this gets.

Let's head to Brazil for the final layer of this rainbow-colored cake. In Brazil, "Black" is a category that can change as fast as you can say “samba.” Brazil's "Black" spectrum includes terms like "preto" (Black), "pardo" (mixed race), "moreno" (tan or brown), and even "branco" (white), depending on one’s skin tone, socioeconomic status, and hairstyle on any given Tuesday. Here, "Blackness" is like a chameleon, constantly adapting to fit the social context.

All of this brings us back to Africa, where the concept of "Black" is often far less important than the intricate, varied identities that people claim for themselves—identities based on language, ethnicity, culture, religion, or even the village from which your grandmother hailed. In Africa, to be "Black" might matter less than to be Yoruba, Xhosa, Fulani, or Tigrinya.

So, what does it mean to be "Black"? It seems to depend on where you are standing, who you ask, and perhaps most importantly, who is doing the asking. A fascinating contradiction indeed, and one that reminds us that the labels we use so easily in conversation carry histories and complexities that stretch well beyond their simple definitions. One thing is clear: there is no one way to be "Black," and perhaps that’s the most wonderfully bewildering part of all.

Uganda Nearly Became Israel.. Here's Why It Didn't

In 1903, the British Empire offered part of East Africa, then under the Uganda Protectorate (modern-day Kenya) to the Zionist movement as a potential Jewish homeland. This became known as the Uganda Scheme.

Theodor Herzl, the father of modern Zionism, saw it as a temporary safe haven for Jews escaping persecution in Europe. But many in the movement rejected the idea, they wanted Palestine, not Africa.

By 1905, the plan was formally abandoned. Africa dodged a geopolitical bomb. Because if the Zionist state had been planted in East Africa, it might be Nairobi under siege today, not Gaza.

Kampala might’ve been caught in occupation, not the West Bank.

#Africa #World 

AFRICAN HISTORY

Apparently, correcting lies about African history is now called ‘Afrocentric.’ Cute.

Today we’re examining British Israelism—a real thing, with books, and graveyard-serious textbooks. Colonel Garnier claimed the ancestor Western Europeans wrote the Old Testament. I want you to judge if Africans have ever published these kinds of serious blunders.

These were people on orange juice and water, not crack cocaine, 50 bottles of whiskey, or heroine, claiming the ancestor Western Europeans wrote the Old Testament.

Today they have shifted the goal posts to “aliens built the pyramids”.

Did they ever have a point?

Western Europeans Wrote the Old Testament? Did We Read the Same Document?

The claim that Western Europeans wrote the Old Testament is the intellectual equivalent of saying Stonehenge was built by the Incas. It’s not just wrong—it’s historically hallucinated. The Old Testament was forged in the fires of Afro-Asiatic culture, centuries before the ancestors of modern Western Europeans had figured out how to bathe regularly or construct anything more complicated than a mud hut. Let’s not pretend plaid kilts, powdered wigs, or last names like Fitzroy and Abernathy were whispering in the winds of the Sinai Desert.

Let’s start swinging.

⸻

Not a Single McDonald or Smith in Sight!

The first clue, obvious to anyone with two functioning neurons, is the absence of Western European names in the Hebrew Bible. You will search Genesis through Malachi and not find a single Montgomery, McDonald, or Smith trying to part the Red Sea. Instead, you get Eliezer, Miriam, Solomon, Zipporah—names blooming from the Semitic soil, not the frosty fields of Sussex.

A few desperate souls, hyperventilating over etymology, proposed that maybe the tribe of Dan was from Denmark 🇩🇰. Cute theory. Unfortunately, “Dan” (דָּן) in Hebrew means judge ⚖️ and was old news a thousand years before Vikings got bored enough to name Denmark. The Danites weren’t setting sail for Scandinavia; they were busy struggling with Philistines in Canaan.

Other hopeful myth-makers insisted that “Tarshish” must be Britain 🏴—because nothing screams “ancient Phoenician trade route” like rainy islands full of druids sacrificing mistletoe. Historical geography? Irrelevant. Actual archaeology? Inconvenient. Biblical Tarshish had ships full of gold, silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks, not sausages and fog.

No surnames. No Scandinavians. No Sheffield steel. Just Semitic lineages, desert landscapes, and divine covenants forged under a sun so hot it would melt a monocle clean off a Victorian face.

⸻

History Hacked by Hopeful Hijackers

When the names didn’t match, colonial imaginations did what they did best: invent. 19th-century Anglo-Israelites 🇬🇧 conjured a theological fantasy where the “Ten Lost Tribes” sailed north and mysteriously fathered the British Empire. Proof? None. Sources? The same place leprechauns and unicorns live.

Their argument boiled down to a fever dream:

• Archaeology: Misquoted or ignored.

• Languages: Mangled.

• Genealogy: Improvised like a drunk bard in a tavern.

Apparently, just having vowels in common made Hebrew and English linguistic siblings. (By that logic, dolphins are the original composers of Italian opera.) And because someone somewhere found a rock and thought it looked “Celtic,” obviously King Solomon had funded Stonehenge. Right?

Meanwhile, the real Hebrews were shaping history between Egypt and Mesopotamia—writing contracts, recording solar eclipses, and developing systems of law before medieval Britons had discovered the revolutionary technology of trousers.

When Moses received the Ten Commandments on Sinai, the ancestors of Western Europeans were still painting themselves blue and talking to oak trees.

⸻

Garden Telescopes and Gravitational Fantasies

Searching for Western Europe in the Old Testament is like trying to detect gravitational waves with a garden hose. You will only find mud, delusion, and—if you’re lucky—an earthworm.

The real authors of the Old Testament operated out of the ancient Afro-Asiatic linguistic world, where Akkadian, Hebrew, Aramaic, and early forms of Arabic evolved. They had ancestors from southeastern Türkiye, Mesopotamia, Yemen, Jordan, and Egypt, fought wars with chariots, and built temple economies whose complexity would have made a medieval Frankish lord scratch his lice-infested head.

Here’s what you actually find when you read the Bible:

 • ✡️ Abraham: A Mesopotamian migrant, not a Manchester merchant.

 • ✡️ Moses: An Egyptianized Hebrew survivor raised as a high-status Egyptian, not a Scottish clan chief.

 • ✡️ David: A tribal warlord from Judah, not a Viking pirate. 

 • ✡️ Solomon: A king who made international marriages and traded spices, not a wool-merchant from Yorkshire.

The Biblical worldview is stitched together from Egypt’s Nile, Canaan’s olive groves, Babylon’s legal codes, and Assyria’s imperial ambitions—not the cloudy hamlets of Anglia or Gaul.

No Western knight ever polished armor beside the Jordan River, while the Hebrew Scriptures were being written. No Norman noble ever wandered Jericho’s ruins in 1000 BCE. No Hapsburg ever heard the Voice from the Burning Bush.

⸻

Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall, Who’s the Most Delusional of Them All?

What they really found, when squinting into their “garden telescopes,” wasn’t Fitzhughs or McHenrys—but their own reflection. The desperate desire to see Western Europe in the Old Testament reveals more about colonial insecurity than it does about biblical history.

If Western Europeans had written the Old Testament:

• The Psalms would rhyme in English couplets.

• The Prophets would debate the finer points of cricket.

• The Laws of Moses would mandate powdered wigs and property taxes.

Instead, we get burnt offerings, desert rituals, purity codes tied to nomadic survival, and genealogies tracing back not to Sherwood Forest but to dusty Near Eastern plains.

⸻

Conclusion? Western Europeans did not write the Old Testament. They barely understood it when they stumbled onto it. Trying to find themselves in its pages is like trying to find Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony on a bagpipe—hilarious, tragic, and ultimately deafening.

The Old Testament speaks in the rhythms of Afro-Asiatic antiquity, not the ballads of Britannia. No amount of delusion, linguistic butchery, or colonial cosplay can change that.

Next time someone says “white people wrote the Bible” — just ask: “Did we even read the same document?”

Expecting self-awareness from the people who think Tarshish was Yorkshire must be asking too much.

#Africa #BlackHistory #World

HISTORY LESSON

Michaela claims Afrocentricity is the new Eurocentricism. She really actually had a lot more to say.

Michaela said: “The Eurocentric racist take on history died off last century and has been laughed at and demolised by modern historians and archaeogeneticists  Africentism has been called that for 30 years and is not a new thing. AFRICENTISM is now the new Eurocentric movement. Racist and idiotic. The facts and the science are all out there and now you are the ones being laughed at and constantly debunked. 

Comparing pictures like children and even being despatate enough to think that denying evolution and the migrations of the human species and being clueless about history makes you an expert....and BTW..using the Bible now...FFS...despatate times for you now science is providing the answers...It's backwards and stupid.”

Here was my response:

Dear Michaela,

Aren’t you that Nobel-Prize-winning Professor of Straw Man Arguments? Thank you for your contribution to comedy. Your attempt to paint Afrocentrism as the “new Eurocentrism” would be impressive—if it weren’t an accidental masterclass in projection. Let’s go through your claims carefully, before your strawmen catch fire and take the whole circus down with them.

You claim that Eurocentric racism “died last century.” Really? Someone better tell the authors of Egypt: Lost Civilizations (2020) still showing whitewashed reconstructions of ancient Egyptians. Or the DNA studies cherry-picking nameless, contextless mummies from Greco-Roman tombs to “prove” that 5,000 years of African pharaonic civilization was somehow “Middle Eastern.” Or the school curriculums that still pretend civilization sprang fully formed from Sumer, bypassing Africa like a cursed continent. Eurocentrism didn’t die. It bought new glasses, changed its name to “Middle Eastern migration,” renamed “Caucasoid” into “Western Eurasian,” and kept rewriting history with a fresh coat of academic respectability. Congratulations—you’ve missed the rebrand.

⸻

What Afrocentrism Actually Is—Since You Clearly Forgot

Afrocentrism isn’t about claiming samurais, Aztecs, or Vikings were Black. That’s the cartoon version built by people who lose sleep over AI-generated memes. Afrocentrism is about:

✅ Correcting the lie that Africa had no history before colonization.

✅ Refuting the lie that ancient Egyptians were white.

✅ Exposing the myth that civilization began in Europe.

✅ Demolishing the pseudoscience of phrenology and eugenics.

✅ Restoring African civilizations like Mali, Kush, Kemet, Axum, and Great Zimbabwe to their rightful places in African and global history.

You know—basic factual corrections backed by archaeology, linguistics, genetics, art history, and classical testimony. The stuff peer-reviewed journals quietly updated while you were busy screaming about “Afrocentrics stealing cultures.”

⸻

On the Topic of Straw Men: Your Real Expertise

You accuse Afrocentrists of denying evolution and “comparing pictures like children.” Cute. Let’s see who’s really behaving childishly:

✅ Afrocentrists point out that Pharaoh Ramesses III’s Y-DNA was E1b1a, common in West and Central Africans today. You reply: “But, but… pictures!”

✅ Afrocentrists reference Blombos Cave (100,000 years ago) and the Green Sahara (10,000–3000 BCE) as cradles of complex African societies. You shout: “But… Bible bad!”

✅ Afrocentrists show that ancient authors like Herodotus described Egyptians as dark-skinned and woolly-haired. You mutter: “But… myths aren’t real!”

✅ Afrocentrists cite studies like Schuenemann (2017) showing non-African elements becoming significant only after 2000 BCE. You pretend the data says “white North Africa since the pyramids.”

It’s a stunning feat of acrobatics—contorting reality to fit your tantrum.

⸻

Evolution and Migration? Thank You for Proving Our Point

You mention “evolution and migration” like a magic spell meant to shut down the discussion. Did you think Afrocentrists deny that humans migrated?

✅ All humans evolved in Africa. That’s called the Out of Africa Model.

✅ Early human migrations out of Africa are dated to 50,000–70,000 years ago.

✅ Civilization did not migrate out with them. Agriculture, cities, writing, and monarchy all began in Africa—after those early migrations.

✅ Egypt, Nubia, and Ethiopia are direct descendants of African Neolithic societies, not Eurasian migrants.

Thanks for reminding everyone that civilization itself is a relatively recent African invention. Appreciate the assist.

⸻

Bible Panic: The Last Refuge of the Cornered

When you screech about “using the Bible now…FFS,” it shows you don’t understand basic source analysis. Afrocentric scholars don’t use the Bible as archaeology—they cite it alongside Egyptian inscriptions, Greek testimonies, radiocarbon dating, DNA, and linguistic reconstructions. You know, the way historians actually cross-reference evidence—not pick and choose quotes like conspiracy theorists on Facebook.

Also, it’s rich to dismiss ancient religious texts as worthless when Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, Manetho, and every classical historian before the common era believed deeply in myths, gods, and omens. History didn’t start with atheists in lab coats. It started with kings, priests, and scribes documenting reality as they understood it.

⸻

Science? Let’s Talk About It Properly

✅ Craniometry and “scientific racism”—destroyed by Franz Boas and Cheikh Anta Diop.

✅ Polygenic theories (separate evolution of races)—annihilated by modern genetics.

✅ Skin color bias—debunked: light skin became widespread in Europe only after 3000 years ago.

✅ Ancient Egyptian DNA—Ramesses III tested positive for E-M2, implying 9 other Pharaohs likely carried E-M2 as well.

✅ S.O.Y. Keita proved that the Amarna royal family, including Tutankhamun, showed biological affinities with ancient Saharan and Northeast African populations, not Europeans or Near Easterners, reinforcing their African origins.

✅ Egyptian art—shows rulers with brown to black skin, broad noses, and coiled hair (e.g., Queen Tiye’s bust, Nebamun’s tomb paintings).

In short: Afrocentrism is aligned with science. Eurocentrism is aligned with outdated 19th-century pseudoscience you’re still peddling.

⸻

What Afrocentrism Actually Opposes (Not That You Asked)

Afrocentrism challenges:

✅ The lie that Africa was a passive, backward place before colonization.

✅ The lie that Egypt was an “outpost of the Middle East” rather than the fountainhead of African civilization. (Pyramids were not only built in Egypt—over 1,000 were built in Sudan. 255 pyramids still remain standing in Sudan, double that of Egypt.)

✅ The lie that darker-skinned people couldn’t have built complex societies.

✅ The erasure of African philosophers, mathematicians, astronomers, and kings from the world’s intellectual map.

Not “stealing cultures.”

Not “making Aztec memes.”

Not “rewriting history to feel good.”

Restoring accuracy. Period.

⸻

And the Funniest Part?

Afrocentrism doesn’t even claim every ancient civilization was Black. It just says: stop erasing Africa’s role in the civilizations we can clearly prove were African. Meanwhile, Eurocentrism literally invented “White Egypt,” “White Jesus,” “Indo-European Sumerians,” and the idea that non-Europeans were incapable of civilization without European help.

Who’s stealing cultures again? Find me billions of artefacts kept in the basements of African museums?

⸻

Final Word, Michaela

Your post was a shining example of how projection works. You accuse Afrocentrics of racism, ignorance, and desperation, but each accusation describes your own strategy:

✅ Racism—pretending African civilizations couldn’t possibly exist without “outside help.”

✅ Ignorance—repeating debunked 19th-century myths about African history.

✅ Desperation—building straw men because you can’t refute the actual evidence.

If you’re wondering why Afrocentrists are calm while you’re flailing, it’s simple:

Facts aged like wine. Lies aged like milk.

Next time, bring a peer-reviewed study that actually refutes Afrocentric evidence—not Reddit rants. I’ll wait. Maybe then we can have a real conversation.

Until then, Afrocentrism will continue doing what it does best:

Correcting the lies you were too comfortable to question.

#America #History #World

Cartographers, Conspiracies, and Curses: How the Middle East Was Invented

The story of the modern Middle East doesn’t begin with freedom or flourishing—it begins with a funeral. The Ottoman Empire, once the sprawling “Sick Man of Europe,” stumbled into the Great War (1914–1918) like a wounded animal and found itself eaten alive. As Ottoman armies fought on dusty dunes and rocky ridges, Britain 🇬🇧 and France 🇫🇷 quietly sharpened their knives.

While the Ottomans struggled to hold back the Russian bear and the British lion, secret conversations brewed in smoky backrooms. Enter the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916): an invisible ink map that carved the corpse of Ottoman land into colonial playgrounds before the body was even cold. Britain would cozy up to Mesopotamia and Palestine; France would sip champagne over Syria 🇸🇾 and Lebanon 🇱🇧. Arab leaders? They were flattered, lied to, and promptly forgotten.

Then came the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), slicing up Ottoman remnants like a wedding cake—only nobody bothered to invite the locals. Instead of independence, the victorious Europeans invented “mandates”, a polished word meaning “you’re not ready for freedom, but we’ll babysit indefinitely.” The League of Nations was supposed to oversee fairness, but in practice, Britain and France treated mandates like Monopoly properties, stacking hotels and harvesting rents.

Thus, through promises broken and borders bulldozed, the Middle East was manufactured, not born—with stitched-up states, simmering identities, and a side order of future rebellions.

⸻

When Nations Were Playthings: Britain, France, and the Sandcastles They Built

France, dreaming of a Mediterranean empire, stomped into Syria and Lebanon with the subtlety of a drunken elephant. In Syria 🇸🇾, any notion of independence was bombed into submission by 1920; France cut and pasted artificial “states” along sectarian lines, ensuring future headaches. Lebanon 🇱🇧 was expanded to include mountains, coasts, and enough Christians to dream of European alliances, leaving its Muslim population seething under a French tricolor.

Meanwhile, Britain played its own imperial games with more polish but just as much poison. Palestine was promised three times over:

 • To Arabs: Freedom, via the McMahon-Hussein Correspondence.

 • To Jews: A homeland, via the Balfour Declaration (1917).

 • To Themselves: Strategic control, via military occupation.

This triple promise was a Molotov cocktail disguised as a love letter. As Jewish migration rose and Arab anger grew, Palestine became a powder keg with a very short fuse.

To the east, Britain invented Transjordan almost by accident. After World War I, Prince Abdullah, brother of the famous Lawrence-backed Sharif Hussein, was handed a chunk of desert as a consolation prize. Thus was born the British protectorate of Transjordan 🇯🇴, a monarchy grafted onto tribal sands.

Further south, the Arabian Peninsula was shaking off Ottoman chains through local ambition. Ibn Saud, a warlord with a mission and a sword sharper than most, battled rival tribes, British puppets, and rival Hashemites to build Saudi Arabia 🇸🇦. His reward? Control of vast stretches of blistering desert…and, beneath it, unimaginable rivers of oil.

Economic transformation followed like a thunderclap. Once reliant on pearls and pilgrims, the region’s destiny shifted when black gold gushed from Bahrain in 1932. Soon oil rigs and pipelines slithered across Arabia, and Britain and America lined up to sip the profits.

Yet prosperity was uneven. Iraq 🇮🇶, also stitched together by British mandate magic, was pushed from “Mandatory Iraq” to a fragile “Kingdom of Iraq” in 1932. The Hashemite kings ruled Baghdad, but Kurdish mountains bristled with rebellion, and Shi’a marshes murmured discontent. Independence was nominal; British influence ran deep through advisors, army bases, and oil fields.

Everywhere, identities clashed: Arab nationalists, Islamic revivalists, tribal chiefs, socialist dreamers, Zionist settlers, and colonial bureaucrats —a cauldron of contradictions, heating toward a future explosion.

⸻

Wars, Warnings, and the Wandering Question of Palestine

World War II smashed into the Middle East 🌍 like a runaway train. Italy attacked from Libya; Vichy France held Syria and Lebanon, forcing Britain to invade them; Iraq flirted with Nazi Germany, prompting yet another British invasion. Everywhere, colonial control was militarized, and nationalist dreams were deferred at bayonet-point.

But Britain itself was weakening. The war hollowed out the British economy and authority. By 1945, whispers of independence turned into screams. Iraq 🇮🇶 seethed for true sovereignty. Egypt 🇪🇬 burned with anger at British bases. Jordan 🇯🇴 pressed for full self-rule. Arab nationalism was no longer a debating society; it was a gathering stormcloud.

And looming largest of all was the Palestinian question.

The horror of the Holocaust created enormous sympathy for Jewish survivors. Britain, now battered and broke, tried to manage Jewish immigration to Palestine—but only succeeded in alienating Arabs and Jews alike. Violence spiraled: bombings, riots, assassinations.

The United Nations stepped in with a clumsy proposal: partition Palestine between Jews and Arabs.

■ A Jewish state.

■ An Arab state.

■ Jerusalem under international control.

Arabs rejected it. Jews, desperate for refuge, accepted. In 1948, as Britain retreated in disgrace, Israel was declared 🇮🇱, sparking immediate Arab-Israeli war.

The British Empire, once master of the seas and sands, now slinked away, leaving behind stitched-together states, broken promises, bitter peoples—and a region whose birth pangs would be felt for generations.

⸻

In the end, the Middle East was not a natural creation but a jigsaw puzzle hammered together with imperial arrogance, corporate greed, and diplomatic deceit.

Its peoples had ancient roots—but their modern borders were drawn by foreign hands shaking over whiskey glasses and maps nobody on the ground had ever seen.

And the ghosts of those choices still haunt the headlines today.

The one successful outcome of the divided Middle East is preventing another Islamic military empire from rising again.

#Africa #BlackHistory #World

THE FULANI – BEAUTY, BRAVERY, AND A NOMADIC LEGACY ACROSS WEST AFRICA

Graceful in movement, proud in spirit — the Fulani people are one of the largest and most widely spread ethnic groups in Africa, stretching across countries like Nigeria, Guinea, Mali, Senegal, and Cameroon.

The Fulani are known for their elegant appearance, with men and women often adorned in fine clothing, intricate hairstyles, and detailed silver jewelry. Beauty is deeply valued — not just outwardly, but in character, speech, and presence.

They are master herders — moving across vast lands with their cattle, always in tune with nature. Their nomadic lifestyle isn’t just about movement; it’s a rhythm of life, a tradition passed down through generations.

One of the most striking Fulani traditions is the Sharo Festival — a coming-of-age ritual where young men must prove their bravery by enduring lashes in front of the community. The ability to endure pain without flinching is seen as a mark of true manhood and honor.

Their language, Fulfulde, flows like music — used to tell stories, sing love songs, and share the wisdom of their ancestors. Despite being spread across many borders, the Fulani hold tightly to their cultural identity, values, and sense of community.

The Fulani are not just nomads — they are poets, warriors, herders, and guardians of tradition.

#Africa #BlackHistory #World 

The Suppliants - A 5th Century BC Problem For Gaslighters

The Suppliants is a tragic play written by the ancient Greek playwright Aeschylus around 463–459 BC. It is one of the oldest surviving dramas and forms part of a lost trilogy. The play tells the story of the Danaïdes, fifty daughters of Danaus, who flee forced marriages to their Egyptian cousins and seek asylum in Argos. Through vivid language and mythological references, Aeschylus explores themes of kinship, justice, race, and the sacred duties owed to refugees.

In The Suppliants by Aeschylus, several clear elements strongly imply that the ancient Egyptians—or at least populations connected to the Nile Valley—were seen as Black Africans by ancient Greeks. The play tells the story of the Danaïdes, daughters of Danaus, who flee Egypt to avoid forced marriages with their cousins, sons of Aegyptus. Their physical description, geographic origin, and cultural identifiers all point to an African identity unmistakably associated with dark-skinned peoples.

First, the most explicit indicator comes from their self-description and the reaction of the King of Argos. The Danaïdes describe themselves as “sun-smitten” and part of a “dark race” (strophe, strongly associating their appearance with darker skin due to intense sun exposure in Egypt.) This is crucial: Mediterranean Greeks, accustomed to their own lighter but sun-tanned skin, explicitly viewed the newcomers as notably darker. Furthermore, when the King of Argos first sees the women, he immediately remarks that their appearance does not resemble Greeks but is more like Libyans (North Africans), Egyptians along the Nile, or even Aethiopians (a Greek term for Black Africans south of Egypt) . He notes they are not like the fair-skinned Greek women but have an appearance typical of African peoples.

Second, the Danaïdes trace their lineage directly to Io, a figure in Greek mythology who was transformed into a cow and wandered to Egypt, where she bore a child by Zeus. They emphasize their descent from Io’s offspring Epaphus, born in Egypt, solidifying their Afro-Egyptian heritage. Io’s suffering and wandering link Greece to Egypt mythologically, but crucially, the offspring are situated firmly in Egypt, among dark-skinned populations along the Nile. This shows that to the Greek imagination, Egyptians—even royal lineages linked to Greek myth—belonged to a darker, African context.

Third, the musical and cultural references made by the Danaïdes, particularly their “Ionian laments” and wailing songs, were considered exotic and foreign by Greeks. Their customs, dress (“oriental richness”), and behavior set them apart from the Greeks. Their cultural alienness reinforces their identification with Egypt as a place culturally and racially distinct from the Greek world, associated instead with Africa and the broader region of dark-skinned peoples.

Lastly, Aeschylus, writing around 490 BC, reflects a time when Greek geographical knowledge understood Egypt as African without the later racial reclassifications that would come during later centuries of Greek and Roman imperialism. The frequent association of Egypt with Libya and Ethiopia in the play shows that, in this early period, Egypt was not seen as a Near Eastern or Mediterranean offshoot but fundamentally part of the African world.

In sum, through skin color descriptions, geographic ancestry, mythological connections, cultural foreignness, and the historical context of Greek-African relations, The Suppliants portrays Egyptians as Black Africans. Aeschylus’ play thus captures how ancient Greeks naturally categorized Egypt within Africa—not just geographically, but racially and culturally too.

#Africa #BlackHistory #World

HERE ARE SOME FACTS ABOUT THE DARKEST CHAPTER IN RWANDAN HISTORY 🇷🇼

■ On the night of April 6, 1994, a plane carrying then Rwandan President Juvenal Habyarimana and his counterpart Cyprien Ntaryamira of Burundi – both Hutus – was shot down, killing everyone on board.

Hutu extremists blamed the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) – a rebel group made of exiled Tutsis – and launched a campaign of slaughter against Tutsis. The RPF claim the plane was shot down by Hutus to provide an excuse for the genocide.

■ Over the next 100 days, more than 1000,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus were slaughtered by Hutu extremists, led by the Rwandan army and a militia known as the Interahamwe.

■ They set up road blocks across the country and went from house to house killing men, women and children. They used radio broadcasts to incite hatred against Tutsis and called on ordinary Hutus to identify and kill all Tutsis.

Hutu leaders handed out “kill lists” to militias familiar with local communities so they could locate and murder Tutsis. Neighbors killed neighbors and Hutu husbands even murdered their Tutsi wives out of fear for their own lives.

Many Tutsis fled to churches to seek sanctuary, but priests and nuns in some cases informed militias of sheltering Tutsis who then killed them, either by burning down the churches or slaughtering them with machetes.

As many as 10,000 people were killed per day. Seventy percent of the Tutsi population was wiped out, and over 10 percent of the total Rwandan population.

■ Sexual violence was used as a weapon of war with up to 250,000 women and girls raped, resulting in thousands of births.

Hutus also released AIDS patients from hospitals in order to form “rape squads” to infect Tutsi women. As a result, thousands of survivors and their children born from rape are infected with the HIV/AIDS virus.

■ The genocide ended in July 1994 as the RPF, backed by Uganda’s army, seized more territory and took control of Rwanda.

■ Fearing revenge attacks, about 2 million Hutus – both civilians and some of those involved in the genocide – fled to neighboring countries such as the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Tanzania and Burundi.

■ The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) was established in Tanzania in November 1994 by the United Nations to prosecute those behind the genocide.

■ Over 90 people were indicted and, after lengthy trials, dozens of senior officials in the former Rwandan regime were convicted of genocide, all of them Hutus. Rwanda also set up community courts to prosecute thousands of low level Rwasuspects.

#GenocideNeverAgain

"KOKAWA" A HAUSA WRESTLING

KOKAWA is one of the Ancients sports of Hausa people since from Their ancient time in Nubia and Ancient Egypt, It is a form of folk wrestling that involves two opponents competing against each other to throw the other off balance and pin them down.

The traditional fight, is a popular dual fight practiced in Many part of Hausa land Especially in Niger Republic 🇳🇪.The whole community participates in it with a spirit of conviviality before, during and after, which gives it all its playful, cultural and religious significance. Famous wrestlers nomadize from village to village accompanied by musicians(makaɗan kokawa) marabouts and other buffoons to fight after the harvest.

In history, the wrestlers of the Ancients Time and early 1950s are considered the greatest wrestlers (YAN kokawa)of All time, because of their mystical and physical forces and their techniques, remain living legends.

Traditional wrestling owes its aura to the simplicity of its practice, the accessibility of combat for the rich and the poor, its resistance to modern sports and above all the fact that it remains a rural sport still retaining its playful and cultural aspects. Customary and political powers, marabouts and fetishists, musicians and singers, buffoons and Olympic experts coexist in the psychological preparation of the wrestlers before, during and after the fights in order to build their confidence and increase the chances. The struggle is the framework par excellence of cultural and bodily expression, rites, beliefs, music, oral poetry of the communities. The wrestler who wrestles is the hero of his group, of his region.

🇳🇪🇳🇪CURRENT STATUS

Nowadays in Niger Republic 🇳🇪 kokowa is the national sport of the country it's like Football in England and the ministry of sports use to organized National kokowa competition Each Year in order to Crown the Sarkin kokowa (the king of wrestling), this event attracts millions of viewers both within and outside Of the country with Canal TV being the broadcast partners for the competition, many companies signed a sponsorship deal and it boasts the popularity of the competition.

The winner of the competition is awarded with sword and huge amount of money and he'll remain the King 👑 of wrestlers till the next competition, the current Sarki is Niamey's Wrestler called Abba, he became the king after defeating the favorite of the Competition a 7 times winner Isaka Isaka of Dosso Region.

After the competition Abba Ibrahim who's born in Ƙafur of Katsina state Nigeria 🇳🇬, but Representing Niamey, pay a visit to the current President of Niger and some former presidents and present his Sword to them.

This year competition is currently taking place as usual and many wrestlers are competing against each other in order to get the New King.

Source: Rabee'u Garba Ruwan Godia

THE SOWETO REVOLT

"The 'Soweto' revolt was preceded by considerable wage increases won by the strikes. But massive increases in the prices of consumer goods and rising unemployment provided the tinder which made the 'Soweto Revolt' flare up nationally.

Germany, the main beneficiary of the preceding boom, then sponsored Black Consciousness via its Rhenish Churches and the co-sociationalist, Van der Ropp, leader of the German Afrika think-tank, patronised Black Review journal and Steve Biko.

But the USA, after hesitatingly tolerating Black Consciousness (BC), and noting that BC was partly an export from the USA of the same Black Power which Presidents Johnson and Nixon ruthlessly repressed, turned its back on BC and also on PAC and by 1980 began to sponsor the ANC."

-Dr. Hosea Jaffe 

Kwatarkwashi Rock, Gusau, Zamfara, Nigeria

Kwatarkwashi Rock is about 350 meters above sea level and has a massive landmass of about 1 square mile. The Rock is located in Kwatarkwashi Town of Bungudu local government area, 12km from Gusau, the capital city of Zamfara, Nigeria. 

Kwatarkwashi rock is a magnificent granitic rock formation, beautiful to behold. The surrounding scenery offers natural ambience for relaxation and adventures. It is one of the most exotic natural rock formations in Nigeria.

According to local legend, some powerful spirits lived in the rock thereby forcing hunters to settle around the foot of the rock, that was how kwatarkwashi town came to be. Settlers in the past use the rock for worship, and the performance of the ceremony called 'Daukar Maiki' (catching of the eagles). Eagles used to live in the caves and catching them was the main feature of Daukar Maiki.

There are caves where the locals used to hide during difficult battles within the rock; the biggest of the caves can hide a thousand people. The rock is also home to a natural spring that never runs dry, providing cool, refreshing water for locals.

Kwatarkwashi Rock is an ideal place for excursion, picnics, sightseeing, bird watching and relaxation.

Source: Taskar Afrika

BELIEFS OF THE YORUBA

Did you know that Yoruba cosmology encompasses a multitude of intriguing concepts, with the notion of multiple dimensions being an integral component of its spiritual and metaphysical framework?

In Yoruba belief, the universe is broadly divided into two main realms:

(1). Aiyé – the physical world, where humans, animals, and visible life exist.

(2). Òrun – the spiritual or invisible realm, where deities (Òrìṣà), ancestors, and other spiritual beings reside.

However, this dichotomy is not absolute. Òrun itself is often considered multilayered, comprising various levels or zones that house diverse entities, ranging from divine beings to ancestral spirits to less benevolent forces. The boundaries between these realms are fluid, and spiritual practitioners like babaláwo (priests of Ifá) can communicate across them, particularly during rituals, divination, and trance states.

The Yoruba also believe in reincarnation (Atunwa) and destiny (Ayànmó)—concepts that imply a soul’s journey across lifetimes and realms. Prior to birth, it is said that a soul chooses its destiny in Òrun before descending to Aiyé.

Òrìṣà and Their Dimensions

Each Òrìṣà is not merely a deity but a force of nature, a guardian of cosmic principles, and a ruler of different "realms." For instance, Òrúnmìlà governs wisdom and divination and has access to all dimensions of time and space. Èṣù is the divine messenger and keeper of the crossroads between Òrun and Aiyé.

The Soul’s Journey: Ori, Ayànmó, and Atunwa

This touches on how every soul (through Ori, the personal divinity) chooses a destiny (Ayànmó) before being born. If a soul fails to fulfill that destiny in one life, it can return (Atunwa), often within the same family line.

Ifá Divination and the Dimensions of Knowledge

The Ifá corpus (through the Odu Ifá) is akin to a spiritual database. Babaláwo can access it to diagnose problems, reveal destinies, and guide people using knowledge from multiple dimensions.

Realms Within Òrun (The Invisible World)

Òrun is not a single "heaven" but a multidimensional realm with layers: Òrun Rere (the realm of good spirits and ancestors), Òrun Apadi (a place of wandering or unresolved spirits), and others.

HISTORY LESSON

Egypt’s conquest of the Levant under the New Kingdom, along with earlier prehistoric expansions, provides a clear explanation for the genetic similarities observed between ancient Egyptians and some Semitic-speaking populations. These overlaps do not imply that Egypt was founded by Levantines — rather, they reflect the long and dynamic history of outward Egyptian influence, imperial governance, and bidirectional population movement over millennia.

A direct quote from Pagani et al 2015 explains why calling affinity with the modern Levantine populations evidence they founded Egypt is naive: “The predominantly African origin of all modern human populations is well established, but the route taken out of Africa is still unclear…Two alternative routes, via Egypt and Sinai or across the Bab el Mandeb strait into Arabia, have traditionally been proposed…We generated 225 whole-genome sequences…If the northern route was the predominant path followed by the ancestors of the OOA populations, and modern African populations are representative of those at the time of the exit, Egyptians should be genetically more similar to modern non-Africans. Conversely, if the southern route was the main way out of Africa, Ethiopians should be closest to the OOA populations…The haplotype and MSMC analyses thus suggest a predominant northern route out of Africa via Egypt.”

During episodes of Sahara desertification (beginning around 6000 BCE), populations from the interior of Africa migrated into the Nile Valley, contributing significantly to Egypt’s early demographic and cultural foundations. This migratory influx, documented archaeologically in the form of early Neolithic settlements and Saharan cultural motifs in predynastic Upper Egypt, predates any meaningful external contact with the Levant.

Over thousands of years, migrations did occur both into and out of Egypt — particularly during periods of climatic stress, economic expansion, or military conquest. Genetic studies reflect this. For example, lineages like E-M35 (a branch of E1b1b), while found in the Levant, also have African origins and a deep-time presence in Northeast Africa, especially in Egypt, Sudan, and the Horn. Scholars such as D’Atanasio et al. (2018) have demonstrated that haplogroups like E-M78, E-V38, and A3-M13 — all common in the Nile Valley — emerged within Africa and spread both northward and eastward due to African expansions, not the reverse.

Egypt’s New Kingdom military dominance (c. 1550–1070 BCE) established permanent administrative, military, and trade outposts across the Levant. Numerous stelae, statues, and letters attest to Egyptian governors, intermarriages, tribute exchanges, and the installation of Egyptian religious symbols in cities like Byblos and Megiddo. The Amarna Letters (14th century BCE) alone are a record of Egypt’s tight grip on the political networks of Canaan. These long-term political and familial entanglements naturally led to gene flow from Egypt into the Levant, further complicating modern assumptions about directionality in ancient DNA.

What’s crucial is that shared genetic markers do not erase Egypt’s African identity. The presence of certain lineages in both Egypt and the Levant is better understood as Egyptian imperial legacy than evidence of a Levantine origin. The foundational populations of ancient Egypt — especially from the pre-dynastic and early dynastic periods — carried distinctly African genetic signatures such as E-M2, A3-M13, E-M78, and R-V88, as confirmed by D’Atanasio (2018), Hassan (2009), and Hollfelder (2017). These markers trace back to deep-time African population structures long predating the emergence of Semitic cultures.

Furthermore, none of the archaeological, genetic, or linguistic data support the idea that a non-African population migrated into the Nile Valley and constructed Egyptian civilization from scratch. On the contrary, Egyptian religious cosmology, kingship ideology, iconography, spiritual vocabulary, and even body plan — including tropical limb proportions — all align far more closely with other Nile Valley and inner African populations than with the Levant or Mesopotamia.

Egypt’s interactions with the Levant were part of its imperial export, not its origin story. Ancient Egyptians may have left genetic, cultural, and architectural footprints outside Africa, but the reverse is not supported by the data. No Levantine archaeological culture, language family, or biological population has ever been shown to predate, replace, or supplant the indigenous African foundations of dynastic Egypt.

In sum, genetic overlaps between Egyptians and Semitic peoples are the result of millennia of African-led expansions, military conquests, trade networks, and bidirectional flow — not evidence of Egyptian origin in the Levant. Egypt was built by Africans, on African soil, drawing on African spiritual, environmental, and genetic lineages. Nothing in modern genetics changes that fact — it only adds nuance to how far Egyptian civilization reached.

#Africa #BlackHistory #World 

AFRICAN ORIGIN OF CAESAREAN SECTION

Caesarean sections were performed in Africa long before they were standardized across the world. They were invented in Africa long before Europe, and the rest of the world fully mastered how to conduct them (Young, 1944). The procedure is said to have been started since time immemorial. When a baby could not be delivered vaginally, midwives and surgeons would turn to C-sections in order to deliver the baby safely and alive. In areas around Lake Tanganyika and Lake Victoria, midwives and surgeons would perform this procedure (Davies, 1959).

When a baby could not be delivered vaginally, the midwives and surgeons would sedate the mother in labour with a lot of banana wine. A knife would be sterilized using heat, while the mother would be tied to the bed for her safety. An incision would be made quickly by a team, and the quickness was to ensure that there would be no excessive loss of blood, and also that other organs would not be cut. A combination of sterilized knives and sedation would make the experience less painful for the mother (Felkin, 1884). During these times, women rarely developed infections because antiseptic tinctures and salves were used to clean the area and stitches were applied. Shock and excessive blood loss were uncommon. Uganda, Tanzania, and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) were the countries where this was most practised. In Uganda, C-sections were normally performed by a team of male healers, but in Tanzania and the DRC, they were typically done by female midwives (Davies, 1959).

It was in the Ugandan kingdom of Bunyoro that this procedure was most documented. The procedure was performed so well that Robert W. Felkin, a Scottish medical anthropologist, documented all of this in the book The Development of Scientific Medicine in the African Kingdom of Bunyoro Kitara. He witnessed the procedure in 1879 and was captivated by it. What got his attention was that back in Europe, a C-section was considered to be an option only to be used in the most desperate situations. At this time, "nearly half of European and US women died in childbirth, and nearly 100% of European women died if a C-section was performed" (Felkin, 1884).

References:

Felkin, R. W. (1884). Notes on Labour in Central Africa. Edinburgh Medical Journal.

Young, J. H. (1944). Cesarean Section: The History and Development of the Operation From Early Times. H.K. Lewis, London.

Davies, J. N. P. (1959). The development of scientific medicine in the African Kingdom of Bunyoro-Kitara. Medical History, Cambridge Journals.

#Ceaserean #Uganda #Africa #History #World

Does Society Choke Good Leaders: Is It Normal for Idealism to Die with Age?

Plato wasn’t always tired. There was a time when he burned with belief—a belief that logic could lead nations, that truth could tame tyranny, that a philosopher could rule not with weapons, but with wisdom. Back then, he gave us The Republic, a manifesto of majestic ideas where kings were thinkers, not thugs, and rulers read geometry before grabbing the reins of power. But something broke between that bright beginning and the shadows of his final work, The Laws. The philosopher-king disappeared. In his place? Lawbooks, surveillance, and second-best solutions.

What happened? Why did Plato trade a crown of contemplation for chains of compromise? And more importantly, why does this philosophical fizzle feel so familiar to so many young Africans today?

When Athens Looked Like Africa

To understand Plato’s retreat from idealism, you first have to meet the mess that was Athens —a mess many African nations might find eerily recognizable.

This was a city that bragged about democracy but often elected orators over intellects, men with charisma and no compass. There were four usual suspects at the helm—what Plato might call the Four Horsemen of Civic Disappointment:

• The Flatterer—who tickled the crowd’s ego with empty praise.

• The Hedonist—who promised bread and circuses, then passed the bill to the poor.

• The Opportunist—who sold justice to the highest bidder.

• The Vengeful—who blamed every crisis on foreigners or former rulers.

Sound familiar? Swap the robes for suits and you’ve got a roster of modern African leaders who, like their Athenian counterparts, treat elections like talent shows and governance like gut-feeling theater. The more a nation bleeds, the louder the laughter at integrity becomes. And so, just as Plato watched his teacher Socrates die by democratic vote—killed not by kings but by the people he tried to educate—many young Africans watch dreamers silenced, reformers exiled, or truth-tellers trolled.

And just like Plato, they start to wonder: Is the world even wired to accept a good leader?

From Philosopher-King to Law-Loving Grandpa

In The Republic, Plato was bold. He built a state powered by reason, where leaders weren’t elected, but selected after decades of education—math, music, philosophy, and physical discipline. It was radical, perhaps unrealistic, but noble.

Then came the years. And the wars. And the failures. Plato watched Athens fall to Sparta. He saw opportunists like Critias rise and tyrants like Dionysius play political ping-pong with Sicily. He even tried to advise rulers—like some modern intellectuals whispering in presidential palaces—only to find that idealism doesn’t survive well in courts fed by corruption.

By the time he wrote The Laws, Plato was no longer designing utopia. He was managing disaster. No more philosopher-kings—just rulebooks to restrain the reckless. No more perfect guardians—just surveillance, exile, and moral training by coercion if necessary. Plato, once the prophet of possibility, had become the architect of Plan B.

But don’t mistake realism for resignation. The Laws wasn’t a surrender—it was a survival manual. Plato didn’t stop believing in justice. He just stopped believing that people would choose it voluntarily.

Idealism’s Expiry Date? Or Just a Rite of Passage?

So, was Plato weak? Cynical? Corrupted by age? Or was he just—real?

Across cultures, the dance between dreams and disappointment is a rhythm familiar to almost every great thinker:

• Mandela, once a militant, matured into a negotiator.

• Malcolm X, once separatist, opened to global brotherhood.

• Chinua Achebe, once poetic, became prophetic, warning Nigeria about power’s decay.

• Confucius, disillusioned by petty kings, stopped preaching reform and started writing about ritual.

• Soyinka, defiant even in old age, still bares his teeth—though perhaps less naive about the pace of progress.

And then there are those who don’t change—Socrates, Jesus, Sankara—men whose ideals remained intact but whose lives were often cut short because of it. The message? Sometimes, keeping your ideals costs your life. Letting go of them may cost your soul.

So when young Africans hit that wall—when they publish brilliant manifestos, run grassroots campaigns, or design nation-saving policies only to be met with mockery, media silence, or betrayal by their own sociopolitical network—they are retracing Plato’s path. From dreamer to strategist. From what should be to what must do. From The Republic to The Laws.

But here’s the twist: that shift isn’t failure. It’s evolution. Idealism may die, but wisdom is what rises from its ashes.

Does Society Want Good Leaders—or Just Good Liars?

It’s an uncomfortable question. But Plato asked it first. Not with a slogan, but with a sigh: “Until philosophers rule as kings…cities will never have rest from evils.”

He didn’t say “until the people demand better” or “until democracy matures.” No—he knew too well that crowds often choose comfort over clarity, spectacle over substance, and sweet talkers over sages.

So, does society choke good leaders? Sometimes. Especially when:

• Populism weaponizes lies

• Citizens become addicted to pleasure over principle

• Systems reward loyalty to party over loyalty to truth

• Silence is safer than standing for reform

But Plato’s later work is a quiet call to those who still care: If society won’t allow philosopher-kings, then build laws that protect what they would protect. If you can’t lead them with wisdom, at least guard them from madness.

That’s not defeat—it’s adaptation. And perhaps the most honest form of leadership isn’t insisting on being loved, but preparing to be doubted, delayed, even discarded—yet still planting the seeds of the just society, knowing full well you may not see the fruit.

The Final Image

Picture Plato at eighty—tired eyes, wrinkled hands, but still writing. No longer waiting for a perfect ruler, but sculpting laws like armor to protect future leaders from society’s slings and arrows.

That image is not sad. It’s sacred.

And perhaps it’s the same arc many brilliant young Africans must trace—not because they’ve failed, but because they’ve begun to understand the battlefield.

The dream doesn’t die. It just puts on armor.

AFRICAN ORIGIN OF METALLURGIES

African blacksmiths have been crafting agricultural tools, musical instruments, weapons and symbols of power and prestige out of the raw material for ages. Africans began extracting iron ore from the continent's rich deposits roughly 2,500 years ago. Across Africa, workers practiced "bloomery smelting": heating iron-containing minerals in a furnace until the iron particles separate — or "bloom" — from the rest of the minerals, leaving pure, malleable iron. Africans actually preceded Europeans by 300 to 400 years in the development of bellowing technology that allowed more efficient smelting by preheating the iron with a mixture of hot and cool air.

Evidence of copper and iron metallurgies is documented in the continent, in West, Central, and East Africa. Early copper metallurgies were recorded in the Akjoujt region of Mauritania and the Eghazzer basin in Niger. Surprisingly early iron smelting installations were found in the Eghazzer basin (Niger), the Middle Senegal Valley (Senegal), the Mouhoun Bend (Burkina Faso), the Nsukka region and Taruga (Nigeria), the Great Lakes region in East Africa, the Djohong (Cameroons), and the Ndio (Central African Republic) areas. It is, however, the discoveries from the northern margins of the Equatorial rainforest, North-Central Africa, in the northeastern part of the Adamawa Plateau that radically falsify the “iron technology diffusion” hypothesis.

Iron production activities are shown to have taken place as early as 3000–2500BCE in habitation sites like Balimbé, Bétumé, and Bouboun, smelting sites like Gbabiri, and forge sites like Ôboui and Gbatoro. The last two sites provide high-resolution data on the spatial patterning of blacksmiths’ workshops dating from 2500 to 2000BCE. Challenging data such as these are usually ignored or dismissed without serious consideration, but patient and sustained long-term research is contributing to a new understanding of the development of copper and iron metallurgies in Africa, enriching the long-term history of technologies.

References:

(1). Holl, Augustin F. C. (June 2020). "The Origins of African Metallurgies". Oxford Research Encyclopedias. 22 (4): 415–438. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.63. ISBN 9780190854584.

(2). Eggert, Manfred (2014). "Early iron in West and Central Africa". In Breunig, P (ed.). Nok: African Sculpture in Archaeological Context. Frankfurt, Germany: Africa Magna Verlag Press. pp. 1–2.

(3). Alpern, S. B. (2005) Did they or didn’t they invent it? Iron in sub-Saharan Africa. History in Africa 32:41-94.

#Africa #Metallurgy #Archaeology #BlackHistory #World